Time/Place

This meeting is a hybrid teleconference and IRC chat. Anyone is welcome to join...here's the info:

Attendees 

Agenda

  1. Close (or justify) old pull requests https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pulls, especially those older than ~6 months

  2. Hash resources: requirements, expectations, next steps
  3. Last-Modified date design
  4. Code4Lib Philly post-conference event?
  5. ...

Ticket Summaries

  1. Please squash a bug!

    type key summary assignee reporter priority status resolution created updated due

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  2. Tickets resolved this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  3. Tickets created this week:

    key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

    Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

Minutes

1. Closing old PRs: Send email to the author or leave comments on the conflict pull requests, old branches too.

2. Hash fragments:

Create hash resources, give a name and a property, then it is auto created?
Need to know from user's perspective, what is the client expectation? Need to have common understanding before start implement it.
- How does the user create the hash fragment?
- User don't create the hash fragment and just use them?
- Does user delete hash fragment make sense? or just stop using them?
- Http doesn't provide a way to delete hash fragment
- If user doesn't create hash fragment, then it make perfect sense doesn't delete them neither.
- Question1: a dc:creator point to a hash uri and you delete all the properties of that uri, do you remove that triple.
- what if that triple is not in the repository?
- Chain deletion doesn't feel right.
- You have a resource, inside that resource, there is properties point to a hash uri. at the certain point, you remove all the properties from the hash uri, what happen to that triple?
- Treat hash uri as a identifier not actually associate a resource in the repository. (if it make sense)
- Current we don't have a good answer to the question 1. We can treat this as a identifer so no deletion action.
- As properties, hashURIs could contain the "/" character, as described by RFC 3986. But can't use as JCR node.
- Don't have a final conclusion in this meeting, a proposal is need, to discover what property model, linking or not linking, delete link, and etc.


3. Etags: Please look at that page and give comments. Need some agreements on that before start working on it.  

4. C4L: Have a meeting after the Code4Lib conference, what do you think?

other: https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-1443 need to be reviewed