Time/Place

  • Time: 11:30am Eastern Standard Time US (UTC-5)
  • Dial-in Number: (712) 775-7035

Attendees

  • Chris Awre 
  • Evviva Weinraub (star)
  • Robert Cartolano
  • Aaron Choate
  • Stefano Cossu
  • Dan Coughlin 
  • Tom Cramer
  • Jon Dunn
  • Declan Fleming 
  • Maude Francis
  • Mike Giarlo
  • Wolfram Horstmann 
  • Neil Jefferies
  • Debra Kurtz
  • Susan Lafferty
  • Steve Marks
  • Tom Murphy
  • Sandy Payette 
  • Matthias Razum
  • Nick Ruest
  • Robin Lindley Ruggaber
  • Dan Santamaria
  • Jon Stroop
  • Jim Tuttle
  • Keith Webster
  • Evviva Weinraub
  • David Wilcox
  • Andrew Woods
  • Maurice York

Agenda

Topic

LeadNotes

Face-2-face Sprint, topics:

1. Finalize Fedora API Specification
2. Develop a Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK) against the specified API
3. Align the "community" Fedora code base to the specified API
4. Align "alternate" Fedora implementations to the specified API
...looking for interested institutions.
Andrew  
2017 Fedora project goalsDavid 

CNI/DuraSpace Summit

  • Should we have a Fedora Leaders meeting on April 6 after the summit to discuss branding and other issues?
  • CNI proposals are due Feb. 6 - what should we submit?
David 

Fedora Omeka S connector

  • Is anyone interested in a Fedora/Omeka S integration?
  • The developer of the connector is looking for institutions to harvest from and test the connector.
David 
   

Previous Actions

None Mentioned

Minutes

  • Interest in F2F Sprint for a week at Institution (who volunteers) finalizing the API specification, technology compatibility kit, and move Fedora toward servicing specification, and bring alternate implementations into closer collaboration.  Sprint around standardization around current & emerging implementations. 
      • Some concerns that we need people for an editorial board or a technical community meeting, not a sprint.
        • Migration path is more of a concern than API development for many institutions
        • Interested and desire a solid spec for API, but a solid core implementation is a higher priority for most on the call 
        • Stability in current implementations are more important than an API spec - even though many consider the API spec as important and valuable
      • What resources do we need for this sprint? 
        • Concrete development work around 2, 3, & 4
      • This sprint should help define THIS IS WHAT FEDORA IS
    • Have we gotten response from the community around the Digital Preservation discussion? 
      • Feedback given before we begin work on 2, 3, & 4
    • Two different things we think we need
      • Representatives who are vested in Fedora working within architecture
      • Representatives/committers and others people who are sprinting against the API
    • The group agrees that API work is important, but core stabilization is the most important for local priorities
      • Some feel the API specification is primary importance which will help to influence the work done on the core
    • Getting the spec to a "degree of completeness" and making an announcement to the community to gather feedback about whether needs are being met for needs from Fedora. 
    • Interest from Northwestern, UCSD, and UVA to participate in the API Sprint - Andrew & David will reach out to the community and see if we can gain more support. 
  • Fedora Project Goals
    • David will send out for final feedback - watch your email for deadline for feedback
  • CNI/DuraSpace Summit
    • DuraSpace Summit currently scheduled for April 5th with a possible reception on evening of April 4th.  
    • Fedora Meeting would be April 6th - Desire to have a Strategic Planning day around Fedora
      • General consensus is that this is a good date and a good idea
    • Session Proposals - let's talk offline - David will post something on the list
      • Import/Export Panel with Andrew & Karen Estlund
      • Session talking about testing progression of Fedora 4, problems and things that have changed
  • Fedora Omeka S connector
    • Anyone interested in offering Fedora 4 harvesting for testing? 
      • UCSD & IU are interested in potentially opening something up
      • UVA may have written something connecting Fedora 3 to "old" Omeka
      • Interest, but some schools aren't using Fedora 4 yet - keep us posted. 

Actions