Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Time/Place

This meeting is a hybrid teleconference and IRC chat. Anyone is welcome to join...here's the info:

Attendees

Agenda

  1. 4.7.5 release testing - discussion of where things stand
  2. Sign up for API Alignment sprints by adding your name
  3. Pairtree/Appletree options
    1. Proposal (based on group discussion)

      1. by default, minted identifiers should not have any pairtree structure
      2. by supplying a system property, the current pairtree generation can be restored
      3. retrieving the pairtree nodes should either a) require a second system property or b) not be supported at all
  4. External Content: Redirect or Proxy? on fedora-tech
    1. Where is this landing?
  5. FCREPO-2520 - Getting issue details... STATUS  - Also move forward with creation-side resolution?
  6. Compatibility Test Suite 
  7. ...

Ticket Summaries

  1. Please squash a bug!

     Click here to expand...

    Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
    Loading...
    Refresh

  2. Tickets resolved this week:

     Click here to expand...

    Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
    Loading...
    Refresh

  3. Tickets created this week:

     Click here to expand...

    Key Summary T Created Updated Due Assignee Reporter P Status Resolution
    Loading...
    Refresh

Minutes

4.7.5 Release

  1. Kevin Ford's issue has been resolved - was due to hardcoded config in the release artifact
  2. Solr issues have been observed in testing
    • Solr config is set to use autosoftcommit: 1000ms
    • Some custom predicates do not get indexed
    • Likely all is well

API Alignment Sprints

  1. Please sign-up

Pairtree/Appletree going forward

  1. Proposal:
    1. by default, minted identifiers should not have any pairtree structure
    2. by supplying a system property, the current pairtree generation can be restored
    3. retrieving the pairtree nodes should either a) require a second system property or b) not be supported at all
  2. Peter Eichman is working on a document specifying behavior of container segmentation
  3. There is concern about support for the "pairtree workaround" going into 5.0.0

Fcrepo-2520

  1. Should we be validating the object of ebucore:hasMimeType?
  • No labels

2 Comments

  1. Wherefore the question under heading "Fcrepo-2520"? 

    Is it rhetorical? Is it blocking resolution of 2520?


    1. It was the core question in the discussion. Post-call IRC conversation indicates the answer is "yes".