Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:20:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <300366633.27314.1711617626077@lyrasis1-roc-mp1> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_27313_666977743.1711617626077" ------=_Part_27313_666977743.1711617626077 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
The report of the Architect= ure Review group (January 24, 2007) is now available. See below for lot= s of notes and discussions that went into it. There are some ongoing discus= sions on extension frameworks and workflow systems, along with more detaile= d discussion notes about some of the issues discussed in the report.
See this Overview<= /a> of the Architecture Review Report.
In 2006, the DSpace community undertook a major review of the DSpace arc= hitecture and technology in order to create a roadmap for platform developm= ent to be implemented over the next year. The following documents describe = the group's work:
The group is editing and discussing these draft documents. Nothing is fi= nal, and the process will be as open as possible.
Architecture Review Members: The group has the followin= g ArchReviewMembers
Survey: Draft list of questions for PreReviewSurvey
Review Meeting Materials:
There is a private mailing list (dspace-review, hosted by the University= of Toronto) for the group to handle logistics, but as much discussion as p= ractical will be held in open forums such as the dspace-devel mailing list,= and we invite comments and discussion from the entire community during thi= s process.
For questions please contact MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries (kenzie@mit.= edu) or John Mark Ockerbloom, the chair of the working group at ockerblo@po= box.upenn.edu