Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Advanced Tables - Table Plus


TimeTopicLead
9:00-9:15Welcome, agenda review
9:15-10:15

Discussion. 'Ah Ha!' moments after reading. Any surprises?


David
10:15-10:30Break
10:30 - 11:45

Survey distribution timeline (one month behind sched) and strategy

Idea to deliver a webinar as project update and to kick off survey distribution.

Draft survey preamble: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vsg4NGJ5aDfwQfp63JG4jCgXtyAb37xnfq6K4_BUs5k/edit

Distribution to lists: Samvera-Tech, Samvera-Community, Digital-Curation, Code4Lib, DLF, PASIG, Fedora-Community, Islandora-Community, Islandora-Dev.

Personal solicitations for survey from advisory group members? Volunteers?

Timeline for keeping survey open: Two weeks? With reminders during period. Schedule and draft text and assignments.

Erin
11:45 - 1:00Lunch
1:00 - 2:30

Planning next steps:

Secondary consultation with Samvera, Islandora and Fedora Communities after survey results come back. Advisory board members will receive a summary of anonymized survey results. We will speak to each advisory board member if there are gaps in the data set (e.g. things we thought we would see that we didn't) and surprises in the data set. Feedback will be documented and included in the final report.

Action- provide timeline for setting up individual meetings with Advisory Board members

Action - Determine timeline for next series of virtual meetings in May/June. Get it on our calendars.

Erin
2:30 - 3:00

Final Report / Report out at OR in June 2019

Discussion:

  • What needs to be in there for it to be useful? For you, what would mean success or failure?
  • How can we use our findings to pursue an IMLS project grant in Aug/September?
  • Who will be at OR in Germany? Want to participate in presentation?
  • Any other events where we can propose presentations delivered by advisory board members?


David


Notes

Agenda review

Erin shared that a practicum student is starting on Monday and will be helping with the grant. Erin will send out a message introducing her.

Overview of documents

David - Broad overview of documents, AHA moments

Reached out to a number of institutions and did a brief survey of front-end data model perspective. What is the same, what is different, how difficult to do a migration based on the front-end framework. Islandora is probably the easiest - homogenous, core structure with solution packs, Islandora already has a migration framework. Some issues, some things to be rewritten, but Islandora will likely have the least trouble. Content will be okay, but custom front end will need to be required. 

Este - UX/custom front ends are not necessarily critical to migration, but could be major areas of need for many institutions because that is what users and non-tech staff think of as the library interface. 

Erin - is this something we need to call out as a priority for migration?

Scott - ORM - object relational mapping may be an important component to consider to allow for more easily developing an interface for the underlying repositories.

  • Florida State University
  • National Library of Medicine
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • UNC Chapel Hill
  • Michigan State University
  • Stanford University
  • Williams College
  • Amherst College

Actions