Page History

...

• This can be classified as similar to a UML Association (representing some sort of relationship between two objects) --Mark Diggory 16:59, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

...

• Parts represent Composition Associations from UML, Compositions reflect a "whole/part" relationship. --Mark Diggory 17:02, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
• _ I have questions how this relates to http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-isPartOf I believe theres should be some documentation around this otherwise, these should just be refinements of "isPart"._ --Mark Diggory 17:19, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

...

• This is a further refinement a Composition Association, forcing referential integrity to be maintained, I'm not 100% convinced its neccessary but may have a usefulness if the system is allowing Compositions that do not require addressablitiy. --Mark Diggory 17:24, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

...

• I'm not convinced this is very different at all from a "hasPart" because "Constitutent" could just be considered a restriction on Membership. --Mark Diggory 17:26, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

...

• I wonder about this one as well, because RDF is an open model, unless stated otherwise, almost any relation may be expressed by another agnet/authority to the point that there may be additional assertions of inclusion into any such Collection. --Mark Diggory 17:29, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

...