Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Introductions - All introduced selves & institutions
    • Also noted the expected timelines for each deliverable.
  • Discussion of how to assess prototype
    • Lieven notes we could split Prototype Google Doc into sections (6 total) and discuss one section per meeting
    • May be able to get through more than one section per meeting (3-4 meetings)
    • Pascal notes we should see where the comments/questions come up in the Google Doc.  May be hard to discuss one section at a time (lots of overlap)
    • Andrea notes he still has some unanswered concerns (from April) that came up during original DSpace Entities Working Group (preceding group)
    • Susanna says suggests comments on Google Doc may be of two types...(1) asking for more info on how prototype worksabout compliancy to functional requirements (is the prototype compliant to requirement x?), or (2) detailing disagreement/concerns about prototype directionabout how requirements are met (is compliancy with requirement x implemented in the right/best way?).
      • Tim notes this probably is OK.  If we bring these questions to discussion, then it should be obvious which type of question/comment each are.
  • Next Meeting
    • Tues, September 11 at 15:00UTC (same time)
      • Concentration on Data Model of prototype and any concerns/questions around that.
    • May need to run a Doodle for other meeting times (Sept is busy). We should aim for 3-4 meetings in Sept to keep on schedule

...