...
Continue review of spec changes, plus review of edits since last meeting: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-kunze-ark-18.txt&url2=draft-kunze-ark-21.txt
General Comments
- Roxanne Roxana noted that SNAC might be considering moving away from ARKs; John will follow up
- Adrien has indicated he likely will not be continuing to participate in TWG meetings; consensus was that team as constituted has critical mass, and can continue without looking just now for a replacement
- All are agreed in finding the "diff" format convenient for tracking changes in draft specification; Discussion items below will refer to locations in that diff (at link above) for today's discussion
...
- Tom will provide example of their post-encoding (64bit integer in base31 encoding – eg take out 0 vs O)
- Sheila will forward email re: change in DataCite business model
- John will reach out to CNRS to see if published ARKs that have significant dashes can be mended
- John will reach out to SNAC
- John will turn normalization description into list of numbered steps
- Greg will review text on normalization to make sure his concerns are met
- All should review their position on externalizing persistence statements
- Tom will review 5.1.2 more carefully to see if he has issues
- All should review section 2.2 Label (language on old and new form language ark: ark:/)
- All should please make comments on spec to the list