Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Updated requirements for Query Service

...

  • use existing standards for the query language (SPARQL comes and LDPath (https://marmotta.apache.org/ldpath/) come to mind)
  • should support aggregation functions (e.g. sum(), count())
  • should reuse existing indexes like Solr or triple store if present?
    → do not build another index, if these tools are present anyway

...

  • make optional?
  • will query service be part of the fedora API spec?
  • does it make sense to hardcode the supported queries?
  • only provide a search UI but actually use a triple store?

Answers/Remarks by Andrew Woods

  • Regarding "Query service", we have gotten consistent feedback that an integrated, synchronous search index should come with Fedora. The use case is for clients to create/update a Fedora resource, then immediately be able to query Fedora with the expectation that the resource be in the index. The externalized, asynchronous indices do not satisfy this use case.
  • We will certainly use the queries you have enumerated in the testing of the new query service.

Persistence

Use cases

  • For our cloud infrastructure, docuteam would like to use s3 compatible object storage (provided by Ceph https://ceph.io/)
  • Some docuteam clients might want to stick with a simpler storage model than OCFL to reduce storage requirements

...