Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Ongoing Review / more in depth look at the ISF
    1. Diagrams: VIVO 1.5 to VIVO-ISF change diagrams
    2. Discussion about how grants are handled:
      Questions: is a grant a single n-ary relationship with any number of related PIs, admin orgs, and funding orgs, and their roles? This works fine for what data we now try to represent, but may pose issues in aligning with CERIF and CASRAI which have additional detail for monetary awards and grant proposals.
      What is the relationship between a project and a grant? How can we clearly represent ongoing projects that are funded by more than one grant?
  2. Discussion of bibliographic representation
    1. What are the requirements for publication information to be ISF compliant? Discuss attribution of specific contributions- should these be data properties or specific roles?
    2. Alignment of ISF with BIBO, CITO (see http://sempublishing.sourceforge.net/)
    3. Publication types -- see Google doc at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqosQY8NM9BGdExJb0dSYjlOQnAteEQ5N0F2aE5YZmc&usp=sharing
    4. Discuss attribution of specific contributions- should these be data properties or specific roles?
    5. Laure Haak's blog on ORCID IDs in the publishing workflow: http://orcid.org/blog/2013/08/08/suggested-practices-collection-and-display-orcid-ids-publishing-workflows
    Reifying relationships to support the VIVO application produce an appropriate editing form with every new form of context node introduced?
    1. next challenge in making the application respond to changes in the ontology

     

Notes

 

WebEx Call-in Information

...