Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Focus on Institutional needs (reporting of the institution members for scientific activity??)
  • Consider different perspectives (end users, authors, co-authors, repository managers, research managers, funders)
  • Funder monitoring (using existing API of OpenAIRE for funder compliance and monitoring) - Addon -  https://gitlab.fccn.pt/dev-rcaap/addon-openaire/tree/OpenAIRE5.X
  • Extended metadata schema - hierarchical metadata exposed - CERIF-XML ? (considered on the use cases).
  • Metadata improvement by the submitter after deposit (with internal validation) ?new feature?

 

What should be considered as "core" to DSpace and what shouldn't.

  • Should we consider only for discussion the "Institutional Repository" ?

 

Proposed agenda item: Is there any interest in getting behind developing something akin to the JISC Publication Router? (Jim O. can say more about this if there's interest and time)


Discussion format: to be determined

...