Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Simeon Warner

Saved on

compared with

New Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Andrew Woods

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Open PRs  ...ready to go?
  2. Authorization issues to be decided upon
    1. Deadline for "completing" webac section:
      • all 5 sections covered by end of Aug
    1. "Sprint" on AuthZ until Jul 26th
  3. Deletion-related issues to be decided upon
    1. Recursive delete is not required
    2. Require use of headers to indicate capability
  4. At least one other implementation of the specification
    1. Cavendish discussion
  5. Option for implementation of test suite - contractors
  6. Target AuthZ first
    • Look at F4 impl choices, and decide if they go in the spec or not
    • We all decide to look at that section
    • Action: Andrew to create some finer-grained issues for webac
    • or create a more expansive draft spec
    • Action: all to read solid-webac doc
  7. Deadline for "completing" webac section:
    1. Contractors have been contacted and are interested... even if Python
    2. Define initial scope of work
  8. Follow-up on: Deletion-related issues

Minutes

Plan for landing the spec

  2. all 5 sections covered by end of Aug
  3. "Sprint" on AuthZ until Jul 26th

Contractors

    1. Better error output from tests: What was request, what was response, and what requirement was tested
    2. Provide LDP spec to contractors
    3. Provide Fedora API documentation to contractors
    4. Initial test: Resource Management - GET, HEAD, POST
    5. Initial tests should be limited to things that Fedora impl already does
  2. Discuss again next week
  3. Action: Simeon to create github issue for language of compatibility tests

Delete

  1. #136, do we need to specify
    1. Recursive delete is not required
    2. Require use of headers to indicate capability
  2. Action: Danny to raise delete topics on Slack tomorrow

Branding

...

Minutes

Action Items