Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Upcoming "Alignment to Spec" sprint

  2. Progress on: Possible messaging memory leak?  
  3. Need volunteer for: 
    Jira
    serverDuraSpace JIRA
    serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
    keyFCREPO-2544
    1. Solution is outlined in ticket
    2. https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/1223

  4. LTS policy proposal
  5. Wrapping up fcrepo-import-export-verify: https://github.com/fcrepo4-labs/fcrepo-import-export-verify/pull/48
  6. Report on 4.7.4 Benchmarks and Testing (Carrick Rogers)
  7. Future of PairTrees and  https://github.com/fcrepo4/fcrepo4/pull/1223
  8. Status of "in-flight" tickets

  9. Expand

    Jira
    serverDuraSpace JIRA
    jqlQueryfilter=13202
    serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5


...

  • Sprint starting next week  - 
    • Danny Bernstein will not be available for the first day of sprint next week
    • Danny Lamb switching to second sprint
    • Aaron Coburn asking about the consideration of current features that are necessarily API spec features? (like webac, versioning subtrees, pairtree) 
      • (responses from Aaron Birkland)
      • There may be some changes that might break the exisiting behaviors of fedora that are not part of the API spec. 
      • We do not have a policy that we'll be maintaining some of these hard to maintain behaviors
      • the consensus from last weeks call was that backwards compat is not maintainable
      • no concrete decisions about taking things out yet. 
      • based on discussion at start of sprint, things may end up getting taken out. 
      • some of the old behavior that's in the way or complicates things may be subject to removal
      • bug regarding pairtreeUnknown User (acoburn) encourages discussion around this at start of sprint (taking out pairtree behavior)
      • versioning - most concerning regarding impllementing momento that's consistent with the spec - it may be the case that we have to change the way that versioning is reflected in modeshape. 
  • Update on memory leak issue from Peter Eichman
    • modeshape bug - fixed in modeshape 5.4  been , he has been unable to reliably get the system to fail and hang in test case.   
    • With avoiding transaction rollbacks they were able to run the remainder of the load and it completed successfully. 
    • tested with batch loader? Not gotten back to that yet
    • ran into another issue which may or may not be related - there were some binaries where the metadata was there, but the binaries themselves were not in the system and may never have been.  
      • binaries were probably large enough to not hit the 4k minimum size (repository.json config)
      • related to modeshape upgrade?  no, this was happening in the modeshape 5.3 system causing the failed transactions he was seeing. 
        • these files may never have actually gotten written to the file system (based on looking at backups)
      • next steps: might write files directly to the file system to replace them, though knows that's a bit dangerous
      • one file was a xml file - one jp2 (and a few other types) – maybe one of the directories where these files were sitting got deleted?  It's two pages in a row that are missing
  • JIRA issue  https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-2544
      • Do we use the sprint to remove this type of behavior?