Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand

3.1 General (Jared Whiklo)

  • Empty section

3.1.1 LDP Containers

  • (tick) MUST be able to create LDP Containers: Tested in 3.3
  • (tick)  MUST distinguish between triple types OR MUST return 409 with constrainedBy Link in headers for ldp:contains membership predicate if server cannot distinguish between triple types
    • We return a 409 because we can't distinguish and therefore the next 2 tests are not applicable.
  • (minus) MAY permit ldp:contains membership predicate if server can distinguish between triple types
  • (minus) SHOULD allow Prefer header in request to distinguish triple types if server can distinguish triple types

3.1.2 LDP-NR creation

  • (tick) SHOULD create an LDP-NR if creation request includes NonRDFSource type Link in headers, regardless of Content-Type headers

3.2 HTTP GET

  • (tick) MUST return describes Link to LDP-NR if request is to associated LDP-RS

3.2.1 Additional values for the Prefer header

3.2.2 LDP-RSs

  • (tick) MUST return Preference-Applied header if request's Prefer header is honored (Always applied)

3.2.3 LDP-NRs

  • (tick) MUST return Digest header as directed by request's Want-Digest header

3.3 HTTP HEAD

  • (tick) MUST NOT return a body
  • (error) SHOULD return same headers as if the request was a GET
    • Almost perfect: Binary resources have duplicate headers that are not seen on HEAD
      Jira
      serverDuraSpace JIRA
      serverIdc815ca92-fd23-34c2-8fe3-956808caf8c5
      keyFCREPO-2714
  • (tick) MUST return a Digest header if the same request as a GET would have
  • (minus) MAY omit payload headers from response

3.4 HTTP OPTIONS (Yinlin Chen)

  • (tick) Any LDPR must support OPTIONS per [LDP] 4.2.8. 4.2. LDP servers must support the HTTP OPTIONS method. 

  • (tick) Any LDPR must support OPTIONS per [LDP] 4.2.8. LD servers must indicate their support for HTTP Methods by responding to a HTTP OPTIONS request on the LDPR’s URL with the HTTP Method tokens in the HTTP respons header Allow. 

3.5 HTTP POST

  • (tick) MUST be supported on LDP Collections
  • (tick) MUST include default interaction model in constrainedBy Link header
    • Correct for both LDP-RS and LDP-NR
  • (tick) MUST support creation of LDP-NRs
  • (tick) MUST create and associate an LDP-RS when an LDP-NR is created

3.5.1 LDP-NRs

  • (tick) MUST return 409 if request Digest header does not match calculated value for content of new LDP-NR
  • (tick) SHOULD return 400 if request Digest header's type is not supported (Should 'type' be 'algorithm', like the RFC?)

3.6 HTTP PUT (Danny Bernstein)

  • (tick) MAY include type Link header in request
  • (error)(tick) MUST return 409 if request's type Link is not resource's current type or subtype thereof, or not in LDP namespace
  • Though the message coming back in the case of an attempt to move from RDFSource to NonRDFSource says "Resource Already Exists" instead of returning a constrained by header
  • Same message is returned trying to move from ldp:Container to an ldp:DirectContainer or ldp:BasicContainer or ldp:Container
  • (error) (minus) MUST change resource's type if request's type Link is a subtype of resource's current type
  • (error) (minus)  MUST change resource's interaction model if request's type Link has an LDP interaction model

3.6.1 LDP-RSs

  • (question) MUST be supported on LDP-RSs for non-server-managed triples
  • (tick)  MUST return 4xx (409), with more info in body and constrainedBy Link in headers if request modifies server-managed triples (Are triples different than resource statements?) on a LDP-RS
    • (warning) Currently we allow the use of the -Dfcrepo.properties.management=relaxed option to allow updating server managed triples. Is that something that we will continue to support and if so is the current impl in conflict with the spec?

3.6.2 LDP-NRs (Danny Bernstein)

  • (tick) MUST be supported on LDP-NRs to replace binary content
  • (tick) MUST return 409 if request Digest header does not match calculated value for new content of target LDP-NR
  • (tick) SHOULD return 400 if request Digest header's type is not supported (Should 'type' be 'algorithm', like the RFC?)

3.6.3 Creating resources with HTTP PUT

  • Non-normative section

3.7 HTTP PATCH (Jared Whiklo)

  • (tick) MUST be supported on LDP-RSs
  • (tick) MUST support sparqlupdate
  • (question) MAY support other update types
  • (question) MUST return 4xx (409), with more info in body and constrainedBy Link in headers when modifying protected resource statements
  • (tick) MUST return 2xx if successful

3.7.1 Interaction models

  • (error)(tick) MUST return 409 when modifying the interaction model to a type that is not a subtype of the current type (LDP-NR to LDP-RS or opposite?)I can add an rdf:type of ldp:NonRDFSource to an existing ldp:RDFSource, but I cannot remove the ldp:RDFSource type

3.8 HTTP DELETE (Yinlin Chen)

  • (warning) MAY be supported
  • (tick) An implementation that cannot recurse should not adverti DELETE in response to OPTIONS requests for container with contained resources. 
  • (tick) An implementation must not return a 200 (OK) or 204 (N Content) response unless the entire operation successfully completed. 
  • (tick) An implementation must not emit a message that implies successful DELETE of a resource until the resource has b successfully removed. 
  • (question) Compliance with LDP 5.2.5.1 When a contained LDPR is deleted, the LDPC server must also remove the corresponding containment triple, which has the effect of removing the deleted LDPR from the containing LDPC.
    (question) Compliance with LDP 5.2.5.2 When a contained LDPR is deleted, and the LDPC server created an associated LDP-RS (see the LDPC POST section), the LDPC server must also delete the associated LDP-RS it created.

3.8.1 Depth header ( Danny Bernstein: This section is no longer in the spec.)

  • (tick) MUST support a Depth header in the request, if DELETE is implemented
  • (question) MAY support only certain Depth header values: (How to query?)
  • (question) MUST return 400 if request includes Depth header and unsupported Depth header value: (How to query?)
  • (question) MUST use LDP containment relations for recursive deletion, if recursive deletion is supported: (How to query?)


3.9 External Binary Content

  • (tick) MUST return message/external-body in Accept-Post header (for each supported access-type param of supported Content-Types) if external binary content is supported
    • (In response to what?)
    • Danny Bernstein: a GET on the resource to be POSTed to I believe.
  • (minus) MUST return 415 for LDP-NR create or update if request has message/external-body and an unsupported access-type, or if external binary content is not supported
  • (minus) MUST NOT accept request (return 4xx???) for LDP-NR create or update if request has message/external-body and the server cannot return all the required response headers
  • (question) SHOULD return a Content-Location header for LDP-NR GET or HEAD (read? to match create or update above) with a URI to the content if the server is proxying: (How to query for proxying?)
  • (question)  MAY support an expiration parameter (for LDP-NR create or update?) if the request has a message/external-body Content-Type header
    • (warning) Expiration parameter is possibly up in the air now ? possibly replace with "Prefer" header syntax.
  • (question) SHOULD copy content (for LDP-NR create or update?) if the request has a message/external-body Content-Type header and the expiration parameter is set
  • (question) MUST return 4xx or 5xx (for LDP-NR create or update?) if the request has a message/external-body Content-Type header and the expiration parameter cannot be accommodated
  • (tick) MUST return a contrainedBy Link header (for LDP-NR create or update?) if the response status is 4xx: Tested in 3.2 and 3.3

3.9.1 Referenced RDF content in mandataory LDP serializations

  • Non-normative section

3.8.2 Proxied content vs. redirected content

  • Non-normative section

...