Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. "Prohibit PATCH on LDPCv"
    1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/pull/244
    2. Establish consensus on approach... currently a diversity of opinions
  2. Propose the addition of new terms to the LDP namespace

    1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/245
  3. Clarify reliable method to write into LDPCv

    1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/250
    2. We seem to be contradicting ourselves
  4. Include `Vary` header in LDPRv `OPTIONS` response

    1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/246
  5. PRs

    1. Adding section clarifying acl:Append - pending review from Benjamin Armintor and Daniel Lamb
    2. Add section on ACL linking on resource creation - pending review from Benjamin Armintor
      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/pull/214
      2. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/176
    3. Added text for HEAD and GET requests to LDPCv objects - related to #244
    4. Torching Depth header in lieu of advertising recursive DELETEs

      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/pull/241
      2. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/234
    5. Require support for external content with access-type=url - pending review from Daniel Lamb and Benjamin Armintor
      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/pull/242
      2. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/237
  6. Issues
    1. Use Location header for ingest-by-reference
      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/236
      2. Looks good, needs a PR
    2. What are the semantics of version restoration?
      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/238
      2. Consensus: drop version restoration and use ingest-by-reference instead
    3. Modeshape Impl: Interaction models effectively can't be changed
      1. https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/229
      2. Nothing to be done for the ModeShape impl... others will be different

...