...
...
Andrew Woods thinks a presentation would be good, but is it possible? Esmé Cowles is a maybe as long as he doesn't have to propose it, Simeon Warner is a no, Benjamin Armintor is a no, Andrew Woods is a no, Tom Johnson J. is a maybe. Is there a non-editor who would bring a long view of the project to the panel?
Spec Finalization
Test suite is not complete, per Andrew Woods
Danny B. and Scott P. have been chipping in. Contract is nearly up.
Simeon not able to get the suite to run yet - it's running against the community impl, but not passing. Possible problems there. Need to test the tests.
Andrew thinks test suite can be made available sooner. Need to think of ways of verifying the test suite.
Need to be tracking the implementations. Will solicit soft commitments to conformance by mid-April.
Open Recommendation Issues
#317: Waiting on Benjamin Armintor
#260: Punt for now
- #172: Can't continue waiting for Solid — Simeon Warner will draft updated language for review
- #211: Andrew Woods will close #211 with an explanation that we think RFC 7231's guidance on 202 responses is good enough
#280: Agreed on 1.0.0 except Benjamin Armintor
Other Open Issues
- Andrew Woods and All: review unscheduled issues into the Recommendation milestone by next week
- For issues that we don't add to the Recommendation milestone, how do we get closure?
Action Items
- ACTION - all to flag issues an mark those that should be part of the milestone (by COB 2017-11-01) → Simeon Warner took a pass
- ACTION - Andrew Woods to make PR for https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/246
- ACTION - all to review and comment on https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/issues/236
- ACTION (Daniel Lamb): To create PR: non-norm: LDPCv is both a timemap and a container, but does not allow POST