For starters
You've looked at VIVO, you've seen VIVO in action at other universities or organizations, you've downloaded and installed the code. What next? How do you get information about your institution into your VIVO?
The answer will be different everywhere – it depends on a number of factors.
- How big is your organization? Some smaller ones have implemented VIVO only through interactive editing – they enter every person, publication, organizational unit, grant, and event they wish to show up, and the keep up with changes "manually" as well. This approach works well for organizations with under 100 people or so, especially if you have staff or student employees who are good at data entry and enjoy learning more about the people and the research. There's something of an inverse correlation with age – students can be blazingly fast with data entry, employing multiple windows and copying and pasting content. The site takes shape before your eyes and it's easy to measure progress and, after a bit of practice, predict how long the process will take.
- This approach may also be a good way to develop a working prototype with local data to use in making your case for a full-scale effort. The process of data entry is tedious but a very good way to learn the structure inherent in VIVO.
- We recommend that people new to RDF and ontologies enter representative sample data by hand and then export it in one of the more readable RDF formats such as n3, n-triples, or turtle. This is an excellent way to compare what you see on the screen with the data VIVO will actually produce – and when you know your target, it's easier to decide how best to develop a more automated ingest process.
- The interactive approach will obviously not work with big institutions or where staff time or a ready pool of student editors is not available. There are also many advantages to developing more automated means of ingest and updating, including data consistency and the ability to replace data quickly and on a predictable timetable.
- What are your available data sources? Some organizations have made good institutional data a priority, and others struggle with legacy systems lacking consistent identifiers or common definitions for important categorizations such as distinct types of units or employment positions. You may
