Humanities ontology requirements and design discussion

Duke humanities-related ontology extensions

At the request of the Duke and Brown VIVO implementation teams we are having a work session on modeling things like acting, archives and portfolios, CD recordings and liner notes, catalogs and catalog essays, choreography collections, commissions, compositions and performances of those compositions, architectural design projects, conducting, directing, dramaturgy, exhibitions, exhibition series, festival participation, film, graphic design, group shows, guest teaching, installations, master classes, photography, prints, public lectures, radio broadcasts, radio interviews, puppetry, scene design, sculptures, solo performances, workshops. Please join in or comment if you're interested.

One approach is to first decide general categories –

Here's an example complaint from our Architecture Department:

Professional Practice –

The Vivo profile has been utilized for our faculty in an inaccurate manner regarding their professional practice.  Architectural practice and Art exhibitions are being categorized under “Talks and Presentations.”  This is not an accurate way to describe this very important part of our faculty’s research.  Faculty who make their research, as opposed to writing about it, need to have their work portrayed in a manner that does not imply a one-day effort such as a talk or presentation.  Can there not be a separate category for Practice?  To see a particularly poor representation of this, please see Maria Park’s profile where her exhibitions all appear as though they were a one-hour talk given at these locations, and making the “solo” specification seem particularly out of place as opposed to the distinction it is meant to portray.

This also brings up the need for distinguishing between being the creator of a work vs. being the subject of the work. 

Notes from the meeting

Duke is looking at the existing data in the current faculty reporting system (SES) and trying to represent it in VIVO

Brown has a lot of interaction with the Rhode Island School of Design – working on committees there, curating exhibits, serving as some sort of a judge; they are looking at a number of departments and have a database table called Artistic Works that have been pulled from the faculty CVs.  There are also broader issues with the humanities to discuss in a less immediate sense.

Pat has been working on an update to the spreadsheet and looking at roles

New types of events

Were able to solve some of the issues in diverse event listings when a person had written multiple screenplays.

Remaining issues:

Have we looked at other ontologies of film or art?

There is also the question of FRBR and its FABIO expression

What is the workflow? is this a service that is provided, or is the faculty member editing him or herself

How about having a Professional Practice heading (rather than Artistic Works)

Do we need to use the more general Information Resource or Information Content Entity

We could model all the detail, but our task is to capture the CV

In VIVO we have several ways to approach this:

Next steps

sandbox