Regular Attendees

  • Andrew
  • Bill
  • Chris (tick)
  • Dan
  • Jonathan
  • Danny

General

Discussion Topic

DfR 0.2 Jira

Topic

Discussion Leader

Outcomes of SI meeting

Jonathan

What do we mean by Synch

Dan and Bill

SI Instance

Dan

OCS Integration

Dan and Chris

Availability this week (Impediments)

Dan

DfR timekeeping

JJM

Actions from last meeting

Last meeting

Last Weeks Actions:

Action Item

Assignee

Status

Respond to Peter and Tim regarding questions

Dan

(tick)

Pathfind using the DfR SI Instance

Dan

Still in progress

Provide credentials to Chris for DfR SI instance when he is ready

Dan

Was tied up on other tasks

Bring Chris up to date after vacation

Dan

Mostly done not including OCS

Add task covering in-CloudSync scheduling of tasks (2-day, unscheduled) and update existing task to note that initial 0.2 scheduling with be via cron

Chris

 

Status

  • Jonathan
  • Andrew
    • In-process: DfR LDAP (jira)
  • Bill
  • Chris
  • Dan
  • Danny

Minutes

DfR timekeeping (Jonathan)

  • We need to account for our time in DfR for internal purposes.
  • Retroactively. Send to Jonathan.
  • Per-month, percentage is good enough.
  • Will also do that at the end of the month.

Availability this week; impediments (Dan)

  • Dan: Getting lots of time demanded for Data Conservancy, pushing back. Been running 30-40%, thinks will.
  • Chris: Spent most time on Fedora stuff last week, should be ok on DfR this week
  • Andrew: Helpful to list impediments as they related to being able to deliver on specific things
  • Jonathan: Where does the weekly planning take place?
  • Andrew: Items in JIRA, also this meeting.

SI Instance (Dan)

  • The Fedora instance inside SI instance is not running, so I started it. Unsure why it wasn't started.
  • The server we have it running on is really slow.
  • Went inside the configuration inside Drupal and it's pointing to the wrong location.
  • Running Fedora 2.2.1
  • Also opened up the 8080 port in the firewall
  • Chris: Fedora 2.2.1? Non-3.x is a problem.
  • Dan: Let's look at it in more detail this week.
  • Chris: Yep, if it's not running 3.x we need to figure out the implications ASAP

What do we mean by Sync (Dan and Bill)

  • Note about "sync" terminology vs "backup". Current functionality sits somewhere between. Technically more sophisticated than backup, but not full two-way sync.
  • (Discussion of terminology confusing people. Suggestion to use "Upsync")
  • Dan: Remains uncomfortable that we're not explaining ourselves well, but if we're on the same page that we eventually want to build up something more two-way, then it's ok that we're not all the way there yet.
  • (Discussion about overwrite flag)
  • Dan: Looked at Ubuntu's deja-dupe backup utility. Kind of represents the level of functionality we're talking about now.
  • Jonathan: Need declarative requirements for sync written down somewhere now, but also for later in the year.
  • Dan: Will do strawman, but we all need to have common agreement.
  • Next meeting with Tim and Peter is at 14th at 12 noon eastern.

Discussion of Tech/Management Meetings

  • Andrew: Suggest that we have dedicated tech discussion time.
  • All: Agree to have tech meeting Monday at normal time, up to an hour, and management meeting on Tuesday at 12noon Eastern, techies attend as needed. This week we'll use that Tuesday slot for tech talk.

Action Items

See above for now.

Action Item

Assignee

Status

Send hours/month spent so far to Jonathan

All

 

Dig into the SI instance, validating what version it's running and looking for any other issues

Dan & Chris

 

Get simple declarative requirements together for Tim and Peter on the wiki

Dan

 

  • No labels