...
- Release 3.4
- Any newly-submitted issues for inclusion in the release
- Any issues with votes that should have their priority increased
- Should "completion" of the REST API be considered a high priority for the release? Do we need a review of coverage wrt the "LITE" APIs?
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-649
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-565 (duplicate)
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-674
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-509 (above)
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-612
- http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-611
- Unassigned isssues
- Does the workload make sense for Milestone 1?
Audio and Chat Log
- Download mp3 (59min, 25mb)
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
\[11:06\] <birkland> can you hear me? \[11:06\] <sbayliss> no\! \[11:06\] <barmintor> I don't believe so \[11:06\] <birkland> OK.. just a minute.. \[11:07\] <birkland> am having audio troubles, will be on in a minute or two \[11:09\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-682|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-682] \[11:14\] <barmintor> FCREPO-682: Shouldn't require a SQL Db rebuild, but we may want to require one to ensure consistency. May mean this moves off 3.4 docket. \[11:16\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO/fixforversion/10190?selected=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:version-popularissues-panel|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO/fixforversion/10190?selected=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:version-popularissues-panel] \[11:17\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-492|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-492] \[11:25\] <barmintor> FCREPO-492: Follow-up issue to be created to either provide a migration tool, or to provide a new API method \[11:28\] <barmintor> possibly related to FCREPO-586, Asger looking into this again \[11:33\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-654|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-654] \[11:36\] \* Asger (~82e11a21@gateway/web/freenode/x-wlaiwhmeskijgmvc) has joined #duraspace \[11:36\] <Asger> [http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data|http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data] \[11:40\] <barmintor> FCREPO-654: Raising priority, but this may be moved off 3.4 docket if specification of REST resources cannot be agreed on \[11:48\] <barmintor> FCREPO-663: Need to decide on a direction, and have fcrepo developers commit to enacting this change piecemeal; not confident that non-dev users will ever rally behind this type of issue \[11:51\] <barmintor> FCREPO-650: Moving priority to |
...
major; caveat that only supposed to be relevant to objects and datastreams
\[11:53\] \* barmintor is briefly away from keyboard
\[11:55\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10051&resolution=-1&fixfor=10190&assigneeSelect=unassigned&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10051&resolution=-1&fixfor=10190&assigneeSelect=unassigned&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC]
\[12:01\] <sbayliss> Discussing [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-683|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-683] |