Page History
...
- Tim explained new governance model and survey results:
- see Tim's slides (and embedded notes) from the first part of the "Future of DSpace" Steering Group panel session: Future-of-DSpace-panel-OR14-survey-analysis.ppt
- NOTE: will link to the The full "Future of DSpace" slidedeck once it is posted on the OR14 website. This Steering Group panel took place on Thurs at 5pm.session slides are available at: http://www.slideshare.net/DuraSpace/future-of-dspace-steering-group-panel-at-or14
- see also wiki page: DSpace Product Plan
- see Tim's slides (and embedded notes) from the first part of the "Future of DSpace" Steering Group panel session: Future-of-DSpace-panel-OR14-survey-analysis.ppt
- Plan for a 2 year organised project to make changes, likely scope:
- Single UI, decrease duplicity
- Refactor code base
- This was presented to new Dspace steering group in May
- Technology decisions are made by committers, changing governance to get more aspects/feedback of the community involved, e.g. DCAT, administrators, funders etc. So the managers and decision makers can get support for change.
- Bram, great to tackle more ambitious goals.
- Reflections on DSpace 2 work, of which some did not make it into core, what is the biggest difference with this approach.
- Tim not directly involved in DSpace 2 work, seems in retrospect that the communication around DSpace 2 wasn't great and therefore not integrated back into core.
- RR DSpace 2 was fixed resources for fixed period and no integration work was done. This new work will have to have a full integration framework.
- Tim there will be a product plan for this work to move it forward.
- Bram Dspace 2 new data model but could not fit it in as an evolution, and upgrades were not considered.
- GT with Dspace 2 there were technology challenges. More ambitious projects harder to fit back in.
- Tim, need plan for upgrades and migrations.
...
Overview
Content Tools