Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • not just research anymore: photos, music, data sets, video, etc
    • More different kinds of content and metadata schemas
  • research management systems
    • CRIS moves the repository to the back-end. As CRIS will be the front end
    • In edinburgh, PURE is being used with the LNI to ingest
    • Needs to support "whole research workflow", Grants, etc.
  • simple (visual?) import – think dropbox?
    • Excel, Drag & Drop, minimal work to get things in
    • DepositMO
    • SWORD / SWORD2
    • ScottP: submission should be much much easier.
    • Bram: ScribD also had very easy upload, but poor in metadata. Nice feature in embedding lists & collections in other applications
  • automated metadata capture
  • content easy to use / reuse
  • CRUD (needs to be able to easily Create, Read, Update, Delete – especially via web services, e.g. SWORD2, etc.)
  • Support for branding / theming
  • Support for Customizations (metadata and metadata structure)
  • Various storage system integrations
  • Flexible content workflows
  • Support versioning / relationships
  • flexible authorisation
    • give more control to user communities (do their own branding, etc)
  • Support complex objects (representation of), both human- and machine-readable
  • scientific data sets
  • reporting (generate useful reports
  • Support content reuse ("open" data)
    • e.g. embed info in dept website
  • search (easy)
    • faceting / filtering (e.g. Solr)
  • statistics: regular reports to item authors (like Digital Commons), plus usage/admin reporting
    • bot filtering (automatic?)
  • getting stuff out
  • shareable metadata
    • different metadata "views"
      • shared version vs local use metadata
  • new name (not "institutional repository"): maybe just "repository" or "storage"?
  • support for preservation activities
  • identifiers / persistance (flexible, granular, parts of items, people, collections)
    • the perils of handles...
    • DOIs vs Handles
    • Truly external IDs
  • support access / privacy - making things "dark", either temporarily (embargo) or permanently
  • "repository / DAM system that can display stuff vs. CMS that can do DAM"
    • do one thing, do it well
  • flexible metadata schema
  • dissemination
    • make data usable / able to be "mashed up"

...