Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Richard Jones: DepositMO project
    • dropbox like interface
    • integrated in Microsoft Office.
  • Mark Diggory
    • Changing Branding
    • Presentation of Metadata
    • How well the metadata can be structured in a repository
    • Integration with other storage systems
    • Customization on the workflows
  • Richard R?
    • Versioning
    • Relationing technology: linking items and content to each other
  • Sarah Shreeves
    • Giving more control to the user communities: delegated administration on steroids
    • Good representation on complex objects
  • Adam Field (eprints services)
    • Reporting (getting data out of the repository in a non-publications form)
    • Integration with other websites
    • Search data well
  • Bram
    • Statistics for Repository authors to get more traction
    • annual reporting gets more demanding
  • Richard
    • Faceted browsing
  • Brad mclean
    • Getting things in & managing
    • Getting things OUT again
    • boundaries of a repository are institutional, but ideally you might want to break down those boundaries and make them more disciplinary
  • Richard rodgers question: did OAI-PMH failed in this regard?
  • Mark Diggory: one problem related to that: missing official taxonomies?
  • Elin: problem for disciplines that have no good aggregators yet. It would be a huge motivator for them.
  • Richard Jones: Creating ad-hoc sets that can be easily shared
  • Bram: the issue is not technical. Which organization will put up the effort & the money to make these big portals possible. (example economists online)
  • Stuart Lewis: could not be "one" repository, but different ones. It's a service, not one monolithic thing
  • Elin: focus is not about offering storage, but offering assistance with their content and metadata
  • Robin: "for completeness" we can include Preservation. Justification for having the repository is that it does the preservation (versus CRIS).
  • Stuart: the features for preservation are present only need to be used
  • Tim: DSpace enables preservation but doesn't do it , need in itself. Preservation requires people, policies. No technology/system does preservation – it can only enable one to perform preservation activities.
  • Jones: Person identifiers
  • Diggory: all of your accounts, personal accounts in DSpace?
  • Scott: I hate handles
  • Rodgers: handle vs internal identifiers. Google Scholars ... handle are the work of the devil (no content in the URL's). Exposing metadata in the URI is the way to go.
  • Scott: main point for handle "moving content" to other insititutions is not possible in DSpace.
  • Sarah: Handle "forces" a good practice in standardized URI citation.
  • Stuart: Academics start to understand DOI. Crossref. Selling handles as DOI's.

...