Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Updates:
    1. China
    2. Mike tries to get control about the entry in Bioportal: https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/VIVO
    3. Schema.org is not an ontology, more use in VIVO is appreciated.
  2. Regarding use of XMLLiteral.  vivo.owl currently has 220 datatype properties.  They have ranges tabulated below:

    CountRange
    160None
    34xsd:string
    14xsd:anyURI
    4xsd:dateTime
    3xsd:boolean
    3xsd:int
    1xsd:date

    Here's the query I ran (using robot on vivo.owl in the released version)

    Code Block
    PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
    PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
    SELECT (count(DISTINCT ?s) AS ?nrange) ?r
    WHERE {
      ?s a owl:DatatypeProperty . 
      OPTIONAL { ?s rdfs:label ?l }
      OPTIONAL { ?s rdfs:range ?r }
      }
    GROUP BY ?r
    ORDER BY DESC(?nrange)


  3. Following discussion the group recommends the use of rdf:HTML as range on datatype properties that require HTML editing.  All other datatype property ranges (including no ranges) are edited using a plain text edit editor. It appears that 4 3 datatype properties (vivo:overview, vivo:teachingOverview, vivo:researchOverview) should have range specified as rdf:HTML.
  4. Priorities

...