Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

...

Wiki Markup\[11:06\] <birkland> can you hear me? \
[11:06\] <sbayliss> no\! \
[11:06\] <barmintor> I don't believe so \
[11:06\] <birkland> OK.. just a minute.. \
[11:07\] <birkland> am having audio troubles, will be on in a minute or two \
[11:09\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-682|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-682] \
[11:14\] <barmintor> FCREPO-682: Shouldn't require a SQL Db rebuild, but we may want to require one to ensure consistency. May mean this moves off 3.4 docket. \
[11:16\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO/fixforversion/10190?selected=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:version-popularissues-panel|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO/fixforversion/10190?selected=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:version-popularissues-panel] \
[11:17\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-492|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-492] \
[11:25\] <barmintor> FCREPO-492: Follow-up issue to be created to either provide a migration tool, or to provide a new API method \
[11:28\] <barmintor> possibly related to FCREPO-586, Asger looking into this again \
[11:33\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-654|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-654] \
[11:36\] \ * Asger (~82e11a21@gateway/web/freenode/x-wlaiwhmeskijgmvc) has joined #duraspace \
[11:36\] <Asger> [http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data|http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data] \
[11:40\] <barmintor> FCREPO-654: Raising priority, but this may be moved off 3.4 docket if specification of REST resources cannot be agreed on \
[11:48\] <barmintor> FCREPO-663: Need to decide on a direction, and have fcrepo developers commit to enacting this change piecemeal; not confident that non-dev users will ever rally behind this type of issue \
[11:51\] <barmintor> FCREPO-650: Moving priority to major; caveat that only supposed to be relevant to objects and datastreams \
[11:53\] \ * barmintor is briefly away from keyboard \
[11:55\] <sbayliss> [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10051&resolution=-1&fixfor=10190&assigneeSelect=unassigned&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10051&resolution=-1&fixfor=10190&assigneeSelect=unassigned&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC] \
[12:01\] <sbayliss> Discussing [http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-683|http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-683]