8:30–9:00 am

Breakfast

9:00–9:15 am

Welcome

Agenda, goals and outcomes, space, shared docs, other logistics.
Michelle Futornick (Stanford) 

9:15–9:45 am

Participant introductions

9:45–10:15 am

Setting the Stage

Overview of LD4P & LD4L-Labs efforts, background, context.
Dean Krafft (Cornell), Philip Schreur (Stanford) 

10:15–10:30 am

Break

10:30 am–12:45 pm

Topic Area #1: Ontology

Ontology development, maintenance, extensions, reuse, and related questions.

Session Intro and LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentation:
Steven Folsom (Harvard), Jason Kovari (Cornell)

Lightning talks:

• Gordon Dunsire (RDA): RDA and the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM)
• Rob Sanderson (Getty): The myth of inference
• Gloria Gonzalez (Zepheira): The Library Link Network
• Tim Cole (UIUC): What I learned (the hard way) from the W3C Web Annotation Working Group
• Antoine Isaac (Europeana): W3C Data on the Web Best Practices – Data Vocabularies

Notes from discussion(each table discussed the below questions)discussions

1. Building links between BIBFRAME 2.0, LD4L/LD4P BF Extension, Domain Extensions & the rest of the LOD world

1. discussion of BF relative to other domains (ontology development in Europe and North America; adoption of ontologies by vendors and open source software developers; etc.)

2. BF interactions with extensions - what are these extensions? how are they discovered? how are they developed? how are they managed?

2. Implications of having multiple ontologies in library world.

1. what does this mean for data capture? discovery? maintenance? tooling?

2. what does having multiple ontologies mean for sharing?

3. where are ontologies and vocabularies hosted? how does this require trust networks for updates (also touched on in governance portion of the meeting)?

4. who can conduct maintenance on a shared community-driven ontology? what does that maintenance need to entail?  

12:55–1:55 pm

Lunch

Lunch buffet in meeting space.

2:00–5:00 pm

with break

Topic Area #2: Workflows, Procedures & Production

What linked data means for our existing procedures; moving linked data into production.

Session Intro: Josh Greben and Philip Schreur (Stanford)

LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentation:
Arcadia Falcone (Stanford): Technical Services Workflow Pipeline

Lightning talks:

• Osma Suominen (Nat'l Lib of Finland): From MARC to Schema.org – via BIBFRAME!
• Carl Stahmer (UC Davis): UC Davis Linked Data Implementation
• Arwen Hutt (UCSD): Non-MARC workflows in LOD
• John Ockerbloom (Penn): Keeping sharp focus in catalog and authority work
• Julie Hardesty (Indiana U): Hydra-focused workflows using RDF
• Amber Billey (Columbia): Identity Management see (also) Authority Control

Notes from discussiondiscussions

• Cooperative metadata management in an open, linked-data environment
• Living with both MARC and RDF data in an open, linked-data environment
• Managing authoritative data in an open, linked-data environment
• Service-level access to descriptive metadata and authoritative data in an open, linked-data environment
• Interfaces required for managing workflows in an open, linked-data environment

4:30–5:00 pm

Wrap-Up

5:30–7:00 pm

Reception

Green Library

8:30–9:00 am

Breakfast

9:00–9:15 am

Introduction

9:15–10:20 am15–Noon

Topic Area #3: Tooling and Services

Map existing tool landscape and identify tool gaps. Explore how tools fit together in a continuous workflow.

Session Intro: Simeon Warner (Cornell)

LD4P/LD4L-Labs Presentations:

• Tom Cramer (Stanford): Linked Data Tooling: Maps and Gaps
• Rebecca Younes (Cornell): LD4L-Labs Converter
• Josh Greben (Stanford): Testing Suite and Validation Work
• Kirk Hess (Lib of Congress): LC BIBFRAME Tools: Converter and Editors
• Huda Khan (Cornell): VitroLib: Developing a linked data editor for catalogers
  
• Dave Eichmann (U of Iowa): Reconciliation and visualization

Lightning talks:

• Shlomo Sanders (ExLibris): A vendor's perspective
• Sebastian Hammer (IndexData): BIBFRAME in FOLIO
• Niklas Lindström (Nat'l Lib of Sweden): Vocabulary-driven cataloging at the National Library of Sweden
• Andrew Pace (OCLC): Metadata Refinery overview
• John Graybeal (Stanford): CEDAR demo
• Emmanuelle Bermes (BnF): Linked data in production since 2010; lessons learnt

10:20–10:50 am

Break

10:50 am–Noon

Topic Area #3cont.

Discussion questions:Notes from discussions

• What is current best in class for tools that meet needs? (And why aren’t we all just using them?) – facilitator: Dave Eichmann
• What are the biggest and most pressing gaps? – facilitator: Amber Billey
• How can we organize ourselves to get better and more tools? Are some things better provided as (hosted) services rather than (local) instances of tools? – facilitator: Jason Kovari
• What tools & services for linked data can we use that don’t come from cultural heritage organizations? – facilitator: Christina Harlow
• All of the above

Noon–1:00 pm

Lunch

Lunch buffet in meeting space.

QUESTION FOR POST-ITS:

if If we (linked open data community) could do 2 things to increase community engagement and traction around linked data, what might they be?

1:00–3:15 pm

Topic Area #4: Community Engagement and Adoption

Engagement of user communities. How to encourage adoption of standards, tools, services, infrastructure.

LD4P/LD4L-Labs intro: Michelle Futornick (Stanford), Dean Krafft (Cornell)

Lightning talks:

• Neil Jefferies (Oxford): Distributed authority management in Europeauthorities
• Leif Andresen (Royal Danish Library): Next big steps for cataloging in Denmark and Europe
  
• Caitlin Tillman (U of Toronto): Linked data in Canada
• Tom Baker (DCMI): DCMI and the vocabulary ecosystem
• Sally McCallum (Lib of Congress): Community adoption of BIBFRAME LC Feedback Loops
• Jackie Shieh (GWU): Community aspects of PCC URI group PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC: Outreach Efforts
• Steven Folsom (Harvard): Keeping the Exciting in "vague but exciting"

Discussion questions to be identified as a group

3:15–3:30 pm

Break

3:30–4:30 pm

Next Steps

Tom Cramer and Philip Schreur (Stanford)

Discussion notes

Two things to increase engagement

4:30–5:00 pm

Conclusion