You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Purpose: help the Sustainability WG do an early evaluation of ARK community interests and perceptions of value

Target audience: Expression of Interest (EOI) respondents. Later possibly add up to 535 registered ARK organizational contacts from the NAAN registry (some contacts will be stale).

Time to complete: ?

Working comments in italics

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  1. What value/potential do you see in the ARK identifier/resolver "resolver" links to the new FAQ; do we need to define other terms?
  2. What value/potential do you see in the ARKs-in-the-Open (AITO) project?   Our audience will have filled out an EOI form showing interest in the project? 
  3. Would you travel to attend an ARKs or AITO in-person meeting if it were held in conjunction with another conference of interest?  
    1. If so, what other conferences would be of interest to you?
  4. As a member of the ARK community, would you rather contribute money (eg, membership fee) or effort (eg, developer hours)?
  5. Does your organization run its own ARK resolver (for its own ARKs)?
  6. Does some external group/organization/vendor run an ARK resolver for your ARKs?
    1. If so, who is that group/organization/vendor?
    2. Do you pay for the use of that external ARK resolver?
    3. (optional) How much do you pay for the use of that external ARK resolver?
  7. Would you be willing to use a community-run ARK resolver?  Would you pay to use it?
  8. Would you be willing to use a community-run ARK identifier management service (similar to EZID.cdlib.org) instead of your current solution?  Would you pay to use it?
  9. Would you participate in an open software development effort to create the next great ARK resolver?
  10. Is your organization a member of Duraspace or Lyrasis?
  • No labels