You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes

announcements
  October meetings
  please check FAQ numbers




explicit inflection proposal:

  • ?info requests metadata
  • ?info required, but spec continues to reserve '?' and '??' as optional synonyms 
  • ?info requests anvl/erc, but the spec permits (as always) alternate formats
    • continues to use THUMP conventions with parenthesized args
    • ?info equivalent to ?info()

This is a small adjustment to the spec that doesn't quite specify how to request alternate formats, but cracks open the door to work that we can complete, not in the spec, but in the AITO context. An example of that might be the THUMP request:
                  ?info()as(application/json)




ARKs as URIs or URNs - part 2 of first discussion




ISSNs as NAANs – any thoughts on second discussion?

Action items

  •  
  • No labels