You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Regular Attendees

  • Andrew
  • Bill (star)
  • Brad (before he sails into the sunset)
  • Chris
  • Dan
  • Jonathan
  • Danny

General

  • Call In To: Free Conference Call HD - DuraCloud Line

    Please note that we will be using the Free Conference Call HD line for this call. Information about calling into this line is available from the link above.

  • (star) - Indicates who will be taking minutes

Discussion Topic

Planning Board
Task Board
DfR Planning and Estimating - 0.1

Topic

Discussion Leader

SI Meeting

Jonathan

The DfR Value Proposition (Adv Grp Call)

Jonathan

Mini-Review of Iteration Planning - Key Tasks

Dan

Technology Choices for MEE - How to get there

Chris

Actions from last meeting

Last meeting

Last Weeks Actions:

Action Item

Assignee

Status

Describe/script demonstrations to show

Dan and Jonathan

 

Better conceptualize accounts for DfR

Team

Postponed

Conceptualizing/Design Synch Tooling

Dan and Bill with Team

 

Better set the feasible scope for this year in automated metadata collection

Team

 

Related Information
DfR Software Next Steps - Jan 2012
2012-01-03 - Architecture Meeting, Temple University

Status

  • Jonathan
    • Advisory Group meeting this afternoon on "what is the value proposition for DfR, given an increasingly crowded market?"
  • Andrew
  • Bill
  • Brad
  • Chris
  • Dan
    • Still Working overview documentation (received some good input from Jonathan - not yet incorporated)
    • Still working on synch tool requirements
    • Still looking a SI VM (provided a copy)
    • Prepared for SI meeting in DC
    • Creating cards from last weeks iteration meeting for critiques, pointing and prioritization
    • Reviewed Spring integration particularly for Apache Camel and Mule
    • Worked with the SI VM to look at integration points
    • Help Jonathan get the SI VM working in his desktop
  • Danny

Minutes

Coming up:
  • Big House next week
  • DfR travel tomorrow
Plans for getting cards up for iteration 2
  • Dan already starting to put up cards, needs help from everyone to get cards put up
  • Andrew: can put up security related cards
  • Danny: want to run cards by Dan first
    • These are design deliverables
  • Should plan to get all cards up by the end of the week (before BHR)
  • Dan: need to determine how to break out sync tooling
  • Jonathan: need to have a point person for SI integration - Dan to handle this
  • Will be limiting the security work with regards to the SI integration
    • Goal is to be able to show "basic" set of data via SI UI
SI Meeting
  • Previous planning meeting
  • What are critical goals? Which ones match to 0.2 tasks?
  • We need to "drive a spike" through the entire system
  • 3 or 4 categories of discussion:
    • How will the technical integration actually work? How does our architecture mech with the SI application?
      • Includes authenication and access control
    • How will we keep everything working together? How will be collaborate? How do we keep communication open? How do we get DG support?
    • Review what each team has done so far
    • What is yet to be done in Thorny's requirements list?
  • Andrew: There are several cases where we want the SI system to work in a certain way, that they don't care about
    • How do we get this work done, particularly the drupal work
    • Example: How to tie in a Shib module to the drupal system?
    • Brad: Practical question: Do we need to learn drupal or not?
    • Jonathan: Expectaction is likely that DG will be paid for any work done specifically for DfR.
    • We need to be very precise about what we need to get done.
    • Should start with a small amount of contract time scheduled
    • How/Where can we best use DG as a resource?
    • We should not have to learn Drupal, would be much more efficient to use DG for that work
  • Practical items for 0.2
    • Chris's work is to be able to take a file from DuraCloud, and create a basic Fedora object out of that
    • First "spike" is to be able to view objects in our Fedora via the SI interface
    • Need to determine what metadata needs to be in the object to make that object minimally visible in Islandora
    • Andrew: Concerns about getting there, we are in a position where we're blind to everything on the other side of the SI code
      • We should be comfortable spinning up the SI application
      • Brad: Should we be shooting for a shared integration build with DfR SI application
      • Dan: We may not need to go quite that far, we just need to have access to build the SI app
    • We need an expert on the SI application to talk to, to help with the learning curve. This will likely be Paul Pound.
    • Dan: Likely a strategy will be to create an AMI with the SI app installed, that we can spin up for testing
      • We'll need help from DG to help us get to the AMI built
      • This will be a separate AMI from DuraCloud
    • Andrew: The point is that we should be able to pull down the SI code, install it, and run it
    • Dan: Need to determine the first place in Islandora where we can view and download the file
    • Andrew will dial in on day 2 for discussion on authentication, others are welcome. Plan is for first thing on Thursday morning.
    • Meeting starts at 1pm tomorrow, goes through mid-afternoon on Wed
0.2 Jira Tasks
  • DFR-63: Much of what is required for this was discussed in the previous discussion (what is needed from SI)
    • Andrew: It's important that we be able to operate within a security context. May want to be able to turn on/off security for development convenience.
  • DFR-23: Need to outline the features of the sync tool
    • Under Dan's name, but will need discussion, work from many on the team
    • Danny/Peter will work on much of the user experience
    • Should start listing requirements and design for this work
    • Important part of the spike
  • DFR-79
    • Need to think about when it makes sense to pull in some of the various technical pieces into the mix. First need to investigate and select tools.
    • Bill: Might be better to consider how we can meet user's needs
    • Chris: One of these first needs is file type identification, as an example
    • Dan: Want to be able to use a single execution environment to run all of the pieces
    • Brad: System piece has a low-level piece for actually executing pieces, also have a need to provide a way to view/display this at the user level
      • My not need to couple these two pieces at this point in the project
      • On bottom-up should consider problems we need to solve for next step of development
      • Wait on trying to nail down how the user experience will occur
    • Action: Keep DFR-79 around, but push it out, create a new, more specific jira
Value propositon of DfR
  • We offer the ability for researchers to run processing close to their data (which minimizes cost)
  • We can do preservation, archival, visualization, etc
  • Preservation is the starting point for re-use
  • Dan: The whole point is to promote re-use, particularly across data sets
  • Other preservation services: bit-integrity checking, replication, metadata creation capabilities
  • Richer access control
  • Policy management - we can manage policies for executing specific actions
  • Platform that enables you to build usage models beyond the file system
  • Provides an on-ramp for moving data into a platform where more collaboration is possible
  • When data is backed up as files only, there is no understanding of arrangement
  • Access capabilities - providing the ability to create new exhibitions, APIs, endpoints, displays, etc
  • Many on-ramps and many off-ramps - as well as being able to manage what's happening on the freeway
  • Each piece of the system is open source and has its own community
  • An end goal is to virtualize the cloud completely, so the same code can sit on any infrastructure
  • No labels