This use case no longer has an advocate and is therefore to be disregarded

This use case has likely been completed by the feature described here.

 

 

  1. Transactional
    1. Need to be able to maintain consistency of the data. Also leads to more complex code to cover this issue.
    2. Reversibility of a true transaction is a key part of this requirement, again as the option is more complex code.
    3. A sample use case if changing an authority record and then needing to update the URIs in the related DM records, and needing to do that as a transaction so it is not done until all are completed.
    4. Record locking requirement can also be put here, for example, editing a MODS record and needing to also update the DC when done.
    5. This is important within an object, but also across objects, where a set of objects need to be updated.


 

  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. This is ready for acceptance testing as of 4.0-Alpha-4. There is an outstanding ticket to address letter e here.