Review of discussions at Implementation Fest
Peer review
- Hal and Bryan from the APA made it clear that individual peer review activities need to be confidential – not just on a per-article basis but even if a person is a reviewer for a journal
- Editorial board memberships are public
Datasets
- discussed briefly but we need to review the Datastar ontology model
- want to model
- subject
- methodology
- type
- observational
- invasive
- example: citizen science
- what (topic, discipline area)
- where
- observation that happened
- data
- what meaningful link can you provide for people to use once they've found a dataset?
- the contact information may be most important – person, organization
- format
Representing the humanities
- how far to go in tracking the extended reuse – the information provided from CVs is very flat, but to really want to capture what's on the CV the modeling can become extensive
- an original work combined with others in performances by different groups at different times in different locations
- as Don from LASP showed, it may be helpful to be able to navigate the structure visually
- navigate the graph, represent the network of data
- stop at a certain point and have "more" links?
- a practical matter of how you get the data, and get it at all consistently?
- development branch vs. long-running side branch
- test the migration
What do we need to get in the 1.6 release?
- a way to represent a course as an ongoing entity across semesters, not just individual semester classes
- a collection of events that is not an event series – e.g., performances of one work in multiple venues over time, vs. performances in a series at one place
- additional roles – what are they, and in what if any hierarchy?
- creator
- performer
- organizer
- producer
- director
Suggestions for the I-fest next year
- presenter perspective – a lot to prepare to offer three tracks – is that one too many?
- posting some potential topics ahead of time and voting
- some will want to know ahead of time
- won't be a total surprise what's talked about
- having some un-conference?
- regional events
Ideas for submissions for conference presentations
- A session on publications workflow growing out of Paul's and Nicholas's talks, which provided an interesting counterpoint in looking by person vs. at the institution level
- A 3rd talk about Symplectic's workflow could round out the hour
- Humanities ontology efforts
- polish up the slides?
- Events that are online only – philosophy TV
- architectural practic
- Using VIVO for accreditation – where scholars came from
- for each publication
- what was their role when authored the publication -- generate data on when published as student, postdoc, faculty, or grad
- 5500 publications and only 1000 alumni
- can remain entirely behind the firewall -- wants it to be an e-Porfolio
- connect with people at NIH
- just using the data dictionary
- Paul -- the Weill grad school wants to do just that
- for NIH reporting is so much work done
- 6 or 7 different classes of students -- people hop between them
- for each publication
- knowledge mobilization
Can we look again at ontology tools that support collaborative ontology development?
Jing – would like to have us look at Web Protégé, Knoodl
