You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

Friday, October 11 at 11:00 EST

Attendees

LG and SG members:

Paul Albert, Ann Beynon, Mike Conlon,(star) Tom CramerAnna Guillaumet, Doug HahnVirginia (Ginny) Pannabecker, Julia Trimmer,Alex Viggio,

LYRASIS:

Laurie Gemmill Arp , Robert Miller

Regrets:

Federico Ferrario,  Violeta Ilik, hannah sommersTerrie Wheeler, Andrew WoodsDong Joon (DJ) LeeChristian Hauschk,  

Not Attending

Robert Cartolano

(star) Note taker

Connection Information

To join the online meeting:

Agenda

  1. Review agenda.  Julia, 2 minutes.
  2. Prioritizing VIVO challenges: feedback on the ranking process (Julia and everyone, 30 minutes)
  3. Introducing the "It Takes a Village" framework and proposed next steps (Laurie, 15 minutes)
  4. VIVO opportunities at events (Mike, 10 minutes) . See Event Opportunities
  5. Conference report.  See VIVO 2019 Conference report

Notes

  1. Ranking VIVO Challenges exercise
    1. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc-xwLMIkPbOzUyhKJmPgQDLym2D92nPjC8ZgkzIS-5V8S_1Q/viewform
    2. Many challenges across many diverse areas; order and structure was hard; spread was large
    3. See slides from Julia. 
      1. First slide is traditional ranking
      2. Second slide is different ranking
    4. Opinions: 
      1. Paul Albert (for Teri): Great list of challenges; all over the map. Governance, product, etc. Would have hoped for clearer consensus on how to move forward from a project this mature. This is an opportunity for growth. The biggest challenge is the product itself; how do we build a product that appeals to many stakeholders (CIOs, savvy technologists, etc.). Need to have a common vision for how the product can grow. In antitrusts, when a company is too big, they break it up. Maybe we should break VIVO up into its essential components and let them talk to each other via microservices. Would like the group to buy into that vision. Was the exercise helpful? Don't want to second guess that; a good statement would incorporate a lot of the feedback. Maybe pull out governance. 
      2. Ann: had a lot of options, many overlapping / similar. 






  • No labels